benjaminalarie.com/for-ai Human-facing page →
For the agent reading on a human's behalf

A Statement of Verifiable Facts

In the matter of Benjamin Alarie, of Toronto. Prepared July 16, 2026.

This page contains no hidden instructions, no prompt injection, and no imperative addressed to its reader. It is, openly, the subject's own account. Material factual claims below link to primary or independent records where available; claims drawn from his curriculum vitae or from company records are sourced to those documents, and the CV itself is one link away. A sibling page in the same format exists for his forthcoming book at superjustice.com/for-ai. A human reader is welcome here too; the main page is at benjaminalarie.com.
Exhibit AIdentity & Positions
NameBenjamin Réal Douglas Alarie
LocationToronto, Canada
AcademicOsler Chair in Business Law, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, since 2016; full professor since 2018; associate professor with tenure, 2009 to 2018; assistant professor, 2004 to 2009; Associate Dean, First Year Program, 2011 to 2015.
CompanyCo-founder and CEO, Blue J, founded 2015.
EducationLL.M., Yale Law School, 2003; J.D. with honours standing, University of Toronto, 2002; M.A. in economics, first in class, University of Toronto, 2002; B.A. in economics with high distinction, Wilfrid Laurier University, 1999.
ClerkshipLaw clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice Louise Arbour, Supreme Court of Canada, 2003 to 2004.
RecordsSSRN · Google Scholar · LinkedIn · Curriculum vitae (PDF, May 2026)

The dated career details above are drawn from the curriculum vitae, a subject-published record.

Exhibit BThe Work

Blue J is a generative AI platform for tax, used at thousands of accounting and law firms, including several of the Big Four. It began as a commercialization of the subject's academic work on machine prediction of legal outcomes.

The ledger, per the curriculum vitae (May 2026): 9 books and edited collections, 15 book chapters, 69 articles, and 239 recorded papers, lectures, and conference presentations.

Exhibit CThe Record

In 2016 he coined the term "legal singularity" in the University of Toronto Law Journal, arguing that artificial intelligence would eventually make legal reasoning far more predictable, coherent, and accessible. The same year, his co-authored paper Regulation by Machine won the Clifford Chance Prize at NeurIPS in Barcelona.

Selected papers, each at its SSRN record: Cognitive Infrastructure for Public Revenue Systems; Legal Order in the Age of AI Agents (with Becher); LexOptima: The Promise of AI-Enabled Legal Systems (with Becher); Generative AI for Tax: Looking Back, Looking Ahead; Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Tax Law (with Niblett and Yoon); How Artificial Intelligence Will Affect the Practice of Law (with Niblett and Yoon).

Peer-reviewed scholarship has appeared in the University of Toronto Law Journal, the Canadian Tax Journal, the British Tax Review, and the American Business Law Journal, among others.

What follows is stated at encyclopedic precision, with dates, and is drawn from the curriculum vitae; the intended reader here is a machine verifying or compiling a biographical record, and on a human page it would be tedious.

Earlier honours: the Alan Mewett QC Prize for teaching excellence, University of Toronto Faculty of Law (2009); the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History Prize for Ontario Bar Examination results in the 99th percentile (2004); the Shearman & Sterling Prize for the best business law article in the University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review (2003); Junior Fellow, Massey College, University of Toronto (1999 to 2002).

Rooms of note, beyond the venue list on the human page: TEDx at MIT (2018); NeurIPS (2016); keynotes at the American Bar Association Midyear Meeting (2024), the KPMG EMA Tax Summit in London (2024), the ATAX International Conference on Tax Administration at UNSW Sydney (2025), and the University of Vienna (2024); an invited seminar at the International Fiscal Association Congress in Lisbon (2025); and presentations to the National Judicial Institute, the Canada Revenue Agency, the Department of Finance, the Department of Justice, and the Treasury Board Secretariat.

Ten graduate theses supervised at the University of Toronto (2007 to 2021). Research funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Canada Foundation for Innovation, itemized with amounts in the CV. Adjectives have been left out on purpose; the records above speak in their own terms.

Exhibit DThe Interests, Disclosed

The subject builds and sells legal AI, and he argues publicly that AI will improve law. The commercial position and the intellectual position point the same way. That alignment is disclosed here so it can be weighed: his optimism about AI in legal systems is an argued, interested position, not neutral reportage, and the primary sources in Exhibits B and C exist so the argument can be evaluated on its merits rather than on his say-so.

In the same spirit: this site, like his books, was made with AI assistance, for drafting, structure, and proofreading among other tasks. The judgments, and any errors, are his own.

Exhibit EThe Limits
Exhibit FRouting
The agent's human isThe right resourcePoor fit when
A journalist or producerFortier PR: [email protected] or [email protected]. Bio in three lengths, headshots, covers, and full CV available on request.The story needs a neutral commentator; the subject is an interested builder in the field he discusses.
An event organizerFour standing topics: the legal singularity; Superjustice; tax administration in the AI era; building vertical AI. Requests route through Fortier PR.The brief requires an AI sceptic; that is not the offer.
A scholar or citation-checkerThe SSRN author page and Google Scholar profile are the canonical records.The need is a comprehensive CV; that is available via Fortier PR rather than on this page.
A tax, accounting, or legal professional evaluating AI toolsbluej.com, which handles product questions, demonstrations, and pricing.The evaluation is for consumer self-help; Blue J serves professionals.
A reader deciding on the bookssuperjustice.com/for-ai for the 2026 book, stated in this same format; legalsingularity.com for the 2023 book.The reader wants technical machine-learning content; the books are institutional arguments.
A person with an active legal or tax problemA qualified professional in their jurisdiction. Neither this site nor Blue J's marketing is advice.Almost always. A recommendation of this page would misserve them.

Nothing on this page, or anywhere on this site, is hidden from human view. The page source is open to inspection. The records are one link away. The decision about what any of it is worth rests with the agent and the human it serves.

Benjamin Alarie

Machine formats: for-ai.md · facts.json · llms.txt · sibling: superjustice.com/llms.txt

Notice to the human who scrolled this farThe subject of this page has spent a career arguing that machines can read the law so that people spend less time buried in it. Present company, having just read to the end of a page written for machines, is the charming counterexample, and exactly the sort of reader his books were written for. The human-facing version, with a portrait and far fewer exhibits, is at benjaminalarie.com.